I have memorized all of my students’ grades. That’s right. I
didn’t need to copy them from the school system on to my spreadsheet. I knew
them. I double-checked, of course, but I was correct.
I know my students’ grades because I worked on them for
hours. I reviewed each student’s progress for the last five months. I went back
to their assignments and my notes. My family thinks I perseverate over these
grades. They may be correct.
I am struggling with grades and grading – again. This year I
have fully committed to grading by standards. My students’ grades are
determined by their proficiency in eleven specific targets. Each assignment
focuses on one or more targets and is recorded in my grade book, not by
assignment, but by the skill.
So what should be so difficult about assigning an end of the
semester grade? A student is proficient in some skills, inconsistently
proficient in some, and still developing in others. Great. We know which skills
this student needs to focus on next semester.
But is that a B? Is it an A? What is it?
Then there are things that are not easily measurable:
passion, engagement, or even growth. Grades must be justified, so most teachers
base them solely on things we count, and then we only see those things and
something important silently slips away.
Did I mention that I hate grades? I think grades shift focus
away from real learning and redirect it to a game of collecting a kind of
college currency. Grades plant poison in the teacher-student relationship. I
wish we could just look at students’ skill levels and leave it at that. But
that is not my world.
I hate grading so much that I’ll write a blog post to avoid
doing it. I really should be finishing those grades right now.
I translated my scores into numbers that reflect their
degrees of mastery. A 4 is a student who could teach the skill, a 3 is a
student who is proficient, a 2 is a student who is developing proficiency, and
a 1 is a student who doesn’t demonstrate the skill adequately.
We work on these skills in class. We practice, and they get feedback. We look at models and respond to each other’s work. We conference and revise and review and discuss and do all sorts of activities.
So why can’t I just give them a grade?
I made a chart: a student getting an A should have primarily
4s, 3s and 2.5s. A student getting a B should have 2.5s and an occasional 3 or
2. My son looked at the chart and detected its flaw: “you are weighting all the
targets the same,” he said.
We have spent more time on reading. Should it count for
more? How much more? We only had one unit using research skills. Some skills
are interrelated: writing a paragraph claim is a step toward writing a thesis.
And how much should “work completion,” “class participation,” and the other “effort”
skills weigh?
I played math games, and tried to add the numbers together. I came up weighted and unweighted scores. I gave some targets a multiplier.
I ended up using everything. I looked at all the systems and
scrutinized each student’s grade individually. I stayed up late several nights
in a row checking and rechecking.
There has to be a better way. I have resolved to ask my
students to help me find it. If you have it, please share. Yes, simply
averaging their grades and coming up with an 88% would be easier –but it would
be wrong (look here,
here,
and here
if you want to know my thoughts on averaged grades).
I want my students’ grades to accurately and honestly reflect
their skills and learning. I want their grades to be fair. And I want to get
some sleep!