A teacher strike is different than most other types of union
job actions. Teachers are fundamentally different than most other unionized
groups. The teacher strike in Chicago was as much for the benefit of the
children as it was for the teachers themselves, maybe more so. And while the
breakdown in communication and relations that causes a strike is never a good
thing, the fact that teachers have come together to advocate for students and
schools is critical to the health of our educational system.
No one goes into teaching for the money. While there may be
a misguided few who think that children will worship them, prestige isn’t a
perk of the job either. And don’t get me wrong, I love my summer break, but the
hours and work the rest of the year more than balance out the time; most
teachers are ten-month employees anyway. People don’t become teachers for
summer vacation.
Given the state of education and the mistrust of teachers
right now, there must be something really wrong with a person who wants to get
in the middle of this mess – or that person is really dedicated. Why are
we beating up the few who are willing to spend so much time, education, and
effort to work with children? Why have they become the national scapegoat? And
if we continue down this path, will others be foolish enough to become
educators?
In the City of Chicago, class sizes vary between large and
way too many. Most schools are not air-conditioned. Teachers are fighting
poverty, violence, and a host of social ills. How can kids learn in those
conditions?
And then we are going to evaluate teachers and students
based on standardized tests. We started using these types of high stake tests
way back in the 1980s after the publication of A Nation at Risk. We have spent more than thirty years testing
children and beating up teachers about the scores. And look at the wonderful
changes such a policy has brought!
If you were ill and your doctor gave you medicine that
didn’t help, would you take more of it? If your doctor kept increasing your
dose and you felt even worse, what would you conclude? Of course! The medicine
is aggravating the problem and we need a different approach. Why can’t policymakers
think that way?
Do we build an entire reform system around the few teachers
who are below par? What do we do if mass testing is not the answer? Our
politicians have failed us. Charter schools and corporate education have
created as many problems as they have solved. That is why teacher unions may be
our best chance at real educational reform. That is why the Chicago teacher
strike was so important.
As a teacher in the only non-union high school district in
Illinois, I am not likely to strike. I work at one of the highest achieving and
most affluent schools in the country. So I can sit back and let the politicians
do what they want and it won’t affect my children or my school. Right?
Wrong. The way we treat teachers is wrong. The way we are using testing is wrong. The way we are approaching educational reform is more than flawed, it has become as much a problem as any of the social ills plaguing Chicago schools.
I salute the unions and hope that this strike will help turn
our educational ship on a better heading. If not, education in the United
States will continue to develop into a two-tiered system: one for those who can
afford better and one for those lost in the tests. And who is going to want to teach
or learn in the second system?